September 2008


Peoria, Az – Who will actually benefit from this 700B dollar bailout.  According to Tom Raum, an Associated Press writer, it will be anybody but those that actually need it…the ones who are going through the problem now. 

“Investors, including the millions of people who hold stock in their 401(k) and pension plans, should benefit. Failure to reach a deal over the weekend could have sent stock markets around the world tumbling on Monday.   Homeowners faced with foreclosure or those who have lost their homes get little help from the agreement. Nor will it help people whose houses are worth less than what they owe get refinancing or take out equity loans.  It would do little to halt the slide in home values that are one of the root causes of the current economic slowdown.   “It doesn’t deal with the fundamental problems that gave rise to the problem — or alleviate the credit crisis,” said Peter Morici, an economist and business professor at the University of Maryland.   Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke are potential winners.” -Tom Raum, Associated Press

So, now we have this huge deficit going to bailout the big corporations who put themselves in that mess.  Nobody bailed out the little guy who they actually gave the bad loans to and who lost their homes in the process.  I don’t know, it just doesn’t seem quite fair, now asking those same people to front the money to save those same businesses that took their homes away from them. 

til later,

from the mind of…

Interesting question.  LifeSiteNews.com reported late August that the Archbishop of Denver, Charles Chaput,  stated in his recent book  that he would ask pro-abortion politicians to abstain from Communion, and possibly deny them the Sacrament as well, this coming after Archbishop Raymond Burke, head of the highest court at the Vatican stated that no public official advocating abortion would be allowed to participate in the Holy Sacrament and Communion.

                                                                                

“As a bishop, I have a duty in charity to help Catholic officials understand and support Church teaching on vital issues. That’s never a matter for public theater; it’s always a matter of direct, private discussion.  If that failed, I would ask the official to refrain from receiving Communion.  If he still presented himself, then I would publicly ask him to not take Communion, and publicly explain why to my people and brother priests.  If he still persisted then, and only then, I would withhold Communion from him–because of his deliberate disregard of the rights of other Catholics and the unity of the Church.”

Additionally, Bishop Joseph Martino, of Scranton, PA has stated that he will refuse Joe Biden communion when and if he visited his diocese due to Biden’s Pro-Choice stance. 

  “No Catholic politician who supports the culture of death should approach Holy Communion,” said Bishop Martino, who added, “I will be truly vigilant on this point.”

This topic was a casually mentioned subject during the Democratic Convention after House Speaker, Nancy Pelosi, misquoted the Church on its stance of abortion.  She stated that the Church had no clear response on when life began. 

My question would be, however, why the Pro-Choice stance does not effect each parishnor who takes a pro-choice view on abortion.  The abstaining should be across the board not just leveled at politicians.  I agree with the Church that a stance needs to be taken on the misrepresentation and constant dismissal of this valued view the Church has on Life. 

And still a larger question  would be to our Democratic Presidential nominee.  Why, Mr. Obama, did you vote no on saving the life of an aborted child who survived the abortion?  According to recent news reports he is in favor of leaving them in the garbage to die, as their mother intended. 

I have a personal stake in the right of babies who might be aborted.  Read my story.

The Making Of Me (A Love Story)

In Pro-life, a love story, abortion, memories on 17 February 2008 at 2am

The young mother, bleeding heavily, was wheeled into an emergency operating room.  One of the babies she carried had now miscarried and she prayed fervently to God that he would let this other baby live.  She bargained with him that this child would be raised to know him, to love him…but first he would need to perform a miracle.  Slowly as the medication relaxed her frantic thoughts, she drifted in and out of sleep.

Meanwhile, her concerned husband stood outside the emergency room doors listening as the doctor told him he needed to sign the emergency abortion papers or he would certainly lose his wife due to the amount of blood loss she was experiencing.  Closing his eyes, and thinking of his three young children at home, he took the pen from the physicians hand and signed, giving permission to end the life of the tiny baby frantically trying to stay positioned inside her mother’s womb.

As the surgeons prepared themselves around her, the anesthiologist began to inject his medication into her IV.  They stood back amazed when she sat up, asked them what they were doing and then insisted on being taken out of the surgery room.  Under any other circumstance, this patient should have been sleeping pain free, unable to even open her eyes.  Yet, she sat there as if she had never been given any medication.  Even more surprising was the knowledge that this woman, four months pregnant, had stopped bleeding.

Each year from the time of my earliest remembrance, every December 18th, my mother woke me at 3:00 in the morning to retrace the events leading up to my birth.  Sadly, my morning birthday calls ended in July of 1998.  But,true to her word, when I was five years old, my mother and father found a church with a bus ministry that picked me up for Sunday School and Church.  I rode this bus, faithfully, until I was sixteen years old and could drive myself.  The reason for this I would not learn until later.  But that’s another story.

til later,

from the mind of…

http://www.tldm.org/News12/NewBookByDenverArchbishop.htm

Archbishop Blasts Nancy Pelosi Over Abortion Statements

In John McCain, barack obama, business, democrats, hillary clinton, jeremiah wright, media, news, politics, republicans on August 27, 2008 at 4:00 am

How is it that the Archbishop of Denver along with several other high officials in the Catholic church can blast Nancy Pelosi for saying, on Meet The Press, on Sunday that the church has made no decision about abortion and it doesn’t even make headlines except for on Fox News?

“I would say that as an ardent, practicing Catholic, this is an issue that I have studied for a long time.  And what I know is, over the centuries, the doctors of the church have not been able to make that definition.  And Senator–St. Augustine said at three months.  We don’t know. The point is, is that it shouldn’t have an impact on the woman’s right to choose.  Roe v. Wade talks about very clear definitions of when the child–first trimester, certain considerations; second trimester; not so third trimester.  There’s very clear distinctions.  This isn’t about abortion on demand, it’s about a careful, careful consideration of all factors and–to–that a woman has to make with her doctor and her god.  And so I don’t think anybody can tell you when life begins, human life begins.  As I say, the Catholic Church for centuries has been discussing this, and there are those who’ve decided…I understand.  And this is like maybe 50 years or something like that.  So again, over the history of the church, this is an issue of controversy.  But it is, it is also true that God has given us, each of us, a free will and a responsibility to answer for our actions.  And we want abortions to be safe, rare, and reduce the number of abortions.  That’s why we have this fight in Congress over contraception.  My Republican colleagues do not support contraception.  If you want to reduce the number of abortions, and we all do, we must–it would behoove you to support family planning and, and contraception, you would think.  But that is not the case.  So we have to take–you know, we have to handle this as respectfully–this is sacred ground. We have to handle it very respectfully and not politicize it, as it has been–and I’m not saying Rick Warren did, because I don’t think he did, but others will try to.” -Nancy Pelosi

She also went on to say that it shouldn’t matter anyway when human life begins.   The Catholic Church has very strong feelings on this matter, that being to protect the life at the time of conception.  This seems like a very ardent statement from the church on life and abortion.  And she touts herself as being a very ”ardent Catholic”.  Well, let me tell you something interesting.  I had to have an emergency tubal ligation 21 years ago, at a Catholic Hospital, and the Head Physician at the hospital had to get the Cardinal’s approval…and I am not even Catholic. 

Let’s get the fact’s straight, the Catholic church practices the teachings of the Bible.  In the Bible God states, “I knew you before you were born”. 

I think that about says it all.

til later,

from the mind of…

Obama Doesn’t Make Enough Money To Decide On Abortion

For those of you wanting to voice your opinions in an online live chat format you can visit http://johnmccain.com/blog/   or   http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/hqblog   I can’t vouch for either one of them, although my husband has been having a wonderful time chatting with Obama and Hillary supporters on the mccain blog site.  It’s been an interesting week-end in my house. 

The biggest thing on McCain’s agenda, right now, is to make the Republicans who are pro-life want to continue to throw their support in his directions.  He has to stop this McCain/Liebermann talk now.  If he doesn’t stay on the stance of being a pro-life president (with a pro-life VP) he is likely to loose some huge votes from Christian and Pro-life voters this fall.  Last night on Rick Warren’s faith platform McCain stated, “I will be a pro-life president and this presidency will have pro-life policies.”  I would hope that this means he is picking a pro-life vice president.  Although I like Joe Liebermann, he is sadly pro-choice.  That means my hand is not voting in that direction.  John McCain should note that there are alot of people like me out there.  Right now, I will vote for McCain.  If he puts a pro-choice VP on his ticket, I will begin to investigate alternative choices.                       

Barack Obama didn’t disappoint.  He made no decision at all as to where he stands on this topic.  Except to state that this decision is above his pay grade.  According to a FoxNews.com report, “He explained he is pro-choice, but not pro-abortion, and that he thinks women don’t make the decision to have an abortion casually and wrestle with it.”  That is taking a real stand on an important issue, now isn’t it.  If you are pro-choice, well he said is pro-choice.  If you are against abortion, well so is he.  My brain is confused. Either way, if McCain sticks to his guns, and is not just giving lip(stick)-service to the American voters, he should win. 

til later,

from the mind of…

As found on WorldNetDaily.com:
MATTERS OF LIFE AND DEATH


Archbishop: Democrats don’t know Christianity

‘It’s always important to know what our faith actually teaches


Posted: August 26, 2008
9:30 pm Eastern
  By Bob Unruh
© 2008 WorldNetDaily

 ”DENVER – Denver Catholic Archbishop Charles Chaput says Democrats simply don’t know Christianity if they insist on continuing to spin the Bible’s teachings on abortion.

“It’s always important to know what our faith actually teaches,” he said in a “clarification” for Catholics in northern Colorado as Democratic National Committee members met in Denver this week to hear a speaker from the National Abortion Rights Action League promote Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, the presumptive Democratic nominee, as the next “pro-choice” president.

Chaput’s also appeared at a pro-life prayer vigil outside the massive new Planned Parenthood abortion facility in Denver, reportedly the largest abortion megaclinic in the nation.

“The future of a community, a people, a church and a nation depends on the children who will inherit it,” he said at the event. “If we prevent our children from being born, we remove ourselves from the future. It’s really that simple. No children, no future.

“We need to remember two basic truths. Here’s the first truth. Society has an obligation – and Christians have a Gospel duty – to provide adequate and compassionate support for unwed and abandoned mothers women facing unintended pregnancies; and women struggling with the aftermath of an abortion. It’s not enough to talk about ‘pro-life politics,’ The label ‘pro-life’ demands that we work to ensure social policies that will protect young women and families, and help them generously in their need. In the archdiocese of Denver we try very hard to do that through the Gabriel Project and other forms of outreach and support.

“Here’s the second truth. Killing an unborn child is never the right answer to a woman’s or society’s problems. Acts of violence create a culture of violence—and abortion is the most intimate form of violence there is. It wounds the woman, it kills the unborn child and it poisons the roots of justice and charity that bind us all into one human family,” he said.

In his clarification for church members, he denounced the “spin” among politicians seeking to justify abortion and appease militant pro-abortion interests, including the billion-dollar Planned Parenthood, the nation’s largest player in its abortion industry.

“Catholic public leaders inconvenienced by the abortion debate tend to take a hard line in talking about the ’separation of church and state.’ But their idea of separation often seems to work one way. In fact, some officials also seem comfortable in the role of theologian. And that warrants some interest, not as a ‘political’ issue, but as a matter of accuracy and justice,” he wrote.

“Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi is a gifted public servant of strong convictions and many professional skills. Regrettable, knowledge of Catholic history and teaching does not seem to be one of them,” Chaput continued.

The archbishop pointed to Pelosi’s interview Sunday on the NBC’s “Meet the Press” when she was asked when human life begins. The House speaker said:

I would say that as an ardent, practicing Catholic, this is an issue that I have studied for a long time. And what I know is over the centuries, the doctors of the church have not been able to make that definition … St. Augustine said at three months. We don’t know. The point is, is that it shouldn’t have an impact on the woman’s right to choose.

Chaput said Pelosi, because of her “study,” must know the conclusions from Jesuit John Connery’s “Abortion: The Development of the Roman Catholic Perspective.”

Connery concludes with: “The Christian tradition from the earliest days reveals a firm antiabortion attitude … The condemnation of abortion did not depend on and was not limited in any way by theories regarding the time of fetal animation. Even during the many centuries when church penal and penitential practice was based on the theory of delayed animation, the condemnation of abortion was never affected by it. Whatever one would want to hold about the time of animation, or when the fetus became a human being in the strict sense of the term, abortion from the time of conception was considered wrong, and the time of animation was never looked on as a moral dividing line between permissible and impermissible abortion.”

Chaput continued: “Or to put it in the blunter words of the great Lutheran pastor Dietrich Bonhoeffer: ‘Destruction of the embryo in the mother’s womb is a violation of the right to live which God has bestowed on this nascent life. To raise the question whether we are here concerned already with a human being or not is merely to confuse the issue. The simple fact is that God certainly intended to create a human being and that this nascent human being has been deliberately deprived of his life. And that is nothing but murder.’”

He said the church’s early fathers held abortion was homicide; “others that it was tantamount to homicide.”

“None diminished the unique evil of abortion as an attack on life itself, and the early church closely associated abortion with infanticide,” he said.

Members of the Confraternity of Catholic Clergy also agreed with Chaput, issuing a statement that not only were Pelosi’s statements inaccurate, “Catholics, especially politicians, who publicly defend abortion should not receive communion, and … ministers of communion should be responsibly charitable in denying it to them if they ask for it, ‘until they have reformed their lives.’”

“Abortion (including the willful destruction of human embryos) and euthanasia are always intrinsically evil since they involve the intentional killing of innocent life,” the group said.

Such issues hit home with the Democratic Party in this 2008 campaign, since Obama, who has called himself a Christian, opposed a measure as an Illinois state senator to protect babies who survive abortion procedures, because, among other reasons, it would be too burdensome on abortionists.

“From the beginning, the believing Christian community held that abortion was always, gravely wrong,” Chaput said. “Of course, we now know with biological certainly exactly when human life begins. Thus, today’s religious alibis for abortion and a so-called ‘right to chose’ are nothing more than that – alibis that break radically with historic Christian and Catholic belief,” he said.

“Abortion kills an unborn, developing human life. It is always gravely evil, and so are the evasions employed to justify it,” he said. “The duty of the church and other religious communities is moral witness. The duty of the state and its officials is to serve the common good, which is always rooted in moral truth. A proper understanding of the ’separation of church and state’ does not imply a separation of faith from political life. But of course, it’s always important to know what our faith actually teaches.

At the vigil in front of the Planned Parenthood business, where he was joined by Alveda King, Chaput said the project “would offend every African-American and Latino family, and all of us, because every child lost to abortion here subtracts one more life, one more universe of possibilities and talent, from the future of this community. … The business of Planned Parenthood is the prevention of the future – and business is good, and very profitable, at the expense of this community.”

A report by the Associated Press highlighted the faith of  Sen. Joe Biden, Obama’s pick to be vice president. The report told how he underwent brain surgery for a life-threatening aneurysm in 1988 and asked if doctors would allow him to tuck his rosary beads under his pillow.

But Chaput told AP Biden should refrain even from taking communion because of his support for abortion.

While Obama has been documented as being more pro-abortion than even NARAL, Biden has said he’ll “accept” Catholic church teaching that life starts at conception. However, he said allowing virtually unlimited abortions under Roe vs. Wade “is as close” as society can get to respecting different religious views.

Chaput has stated that such deviancy from church teachings disqualifies those individuals from partaking of communion, which in the Catholic church is believed to involve the actual body and blood of Jesus Christ.”

http://exemployee.wordpress.com/2008/09/13/did-the-archbishop-mean-for-all-catholic-democrats-to-abstain-from-communion/

til later,

from the mind of…

 

Archbishop Blasts Nancy Pelosi Over Abortion Statements

In John McCain, barack obama, business, democrats, hillary clinton, jeremiah wright, media, news, politics, republicans on August 27, 2008 at 4:00 am

How is it that the Archbishop of Denver along with several other high officials in the Catholic church can blast Nancy Pelosi for saying, on Meet The Press, on Sunday that the church has made no decision about abortion and it doesn’t even make headlines except for on Fox News?

“I would say that as an ardent, practicing Catholic, this is an issue that I have studied for a long time.  And what I know is, over the centuries, the doctors of the church have not been able to make that definition.  And Senator–St. Augustine said at three months.  We don’t know. The point is, is that it shouldn’t have an impact on the woman’s right to choose.  Roe v. Wade talks about very clear definitions of when the child–first trimester, certain considerations; second trimester; not so third trimester.  There’s very clear distinctions.  This isn’t about abortion on demand, it’s about a careful, careful consideration of all factors and–to–that a woman has to make with her doctor and her god.  And so I don’t think anybody can tell you when life begins, human life begins.  As I say, the Catholic Church for centuries has been discussing this, and there are those who’ve decided…I understand.  And this is like maybe 50 years or something like that.  So again, over the history of the church, this is an issue of controversy.  But it is, it is also true that God has given us, each of us, a free will and a responsibility to answer for our actions.  And we want abortions to be safe, rare, and reduce the number of abortions.  That’s why we have this fight in Congress over contraception.  My Republican colleagues do not support contraception.  If you want to reduce the number of abortions, and we all do, we must–it would behoove you to support family planning and, and contraception, you would think.  But that is not the case.  So we have to take–you know, we have to handle this as respectfully–this is sacred ground. We have to handle it very respectfully and not politicize it, as it has been–and I’m not saying Rick Warren did, because I don’t think he did, but others will try to.” -Nancy Pelosi

She also went on to say that it shouldn’t matter anyway when human life begins.   The Catholic Church has very strong feelings on this matter, that being to protect the life at the time of conception.  This seems like a very ardent statement from the church on life and abortion.  And she touts herself as being a very ”ardent Catholic”.  Well, let me tell you something interesting.  I had to have an emergency tubal ligation 21 years ago, at a Catholic Hospital, and the Head Physician at the hospital had to get the Cardinal’s approval…and I am not even Catholic. 

Let’s get the fact’s straight, the Catholic church practices the teachings of the Bible.  In the Bible God states, “I knew you before you were born”. 

I think that about says it all.

til later,

from the mind of…